Will New Navy Acquisition Chief Keep the SSN(X) on Schedule?
Earlier this month, the White House announced its nomination of Nicolas Guertin to serve as the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development, and acquisition, a position that has not seen a Senate-confirmed leader since James Geurts, who served in the same role from December 2017 to January 2021 when the Biden administration took office.
Guertin has been performing the duties of the undersecretary of the Navy since then. If confirmed by the Senate, Guertin could face a number of tasks, including overseeing the U.S. Navy’s next-generation SSN(X) program, which is now slated to begin construction in the mid-2030s. The service is currently exploring new ways to design and build the submarine that could put less strain on the industrial base, including solutions like additive manufacturing for submarine construction and repair parts, as reported by Defense News earlier this month.
SSN(X) is the Future of the U.S. Navy
The SSN(X) would be the successor to the Virginia-class SSN design, which the Navy has been procuring since FY1998. The Navy’s proposed Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) budget had requested $237.0 million in research and development funding for the SSN(X) program. The Navy has stated that the SSN(X) will be designed to counter the growing threat posed by peer-peer adversary competition for undersea supremacy. The boats will provide greater speed, increased horizontal payload capacity, improved acoustic superiority, and higher operational availability. SSN(X) will conduct full-spectrum undersea warfare and be able to coordinate with a larger contingent of unmanned vehicles, sensors, and friendly forces. It will retain and improve multi-mission capability and sustained combat presence in deployed waters.
Troubled Waters for SSN(X)?
It would fall to Guertin to guide the program, especially as the service faces increased challenges within the country’s submarine construction industrial base. According to a recent report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), all U.S. Navy submarines are now built by General Dynamics’ Electric Boat (GD/EB) division of Groton, CT, and Newport News Shipbuilding (HII/NNS) of Newport News, VA. These are the only two shipyards in the country capable of building nuclear-powered ships. GD/EB builds submarines exclusively, while HII/NNS also builds nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. The submarine construction industrial base also includes hundreds of supplier firms, as well as laboratories and research facilities, in numerous states. Much of the material procured from supplier firms for building submarines comes from sole-source suppliers. This can result in supply chain bottlenecks, while both shipyards have been described as running at full capacity.
In addition, lawmakers should consider whether it would be technically feasible for the SSN(X) to be powered by a reactor plant using low-enriched uranium (LEU) instead of the highly enriched uranium (HEU) used on other Navy nuclear-powered ships, and if so, what impact that would have on nuclear arms control and nonproliferation efforts, as well as SSN(X) costs and capabilities. Finally, whether each SSN(X) should be jointly built by GD/EB and HII/NNS (the approach used for building Virginia-class SSNs and, in modified form, for building Columbia-class SSBNs), or whether individual SSN(X)s should instead be built entirely within a given shipyard (the separate-yard approach used for building earlier Navy SSNs and SSGNs). The SSN(X) won’t be hitting the water for at least another decade, but it’s likely to encounter some rough seas on the way.
