A Marilyn Monroe Statue Sparks Backlash as It Returns to Palm Springs: ‘It’s Blatantly Sexist’
Palm Springs is preparing for the permanent return of the iconic Marilyn Monroe statue, but not everyone is pleased with the decision. The 26-foot statue, titled Forever Marilyn, has faced criticism for its depiction of the Hollywood star’s famous scene from the 1955 film The Seven Year Itch. While some see it as a source of joy and attraction, others argue that it is a sexist representation of Monroe.
The stainless steel and aluminum sculpture, capturing Monroe in a flaring white halter dress, was once a popular tourist attraction in Palm Springs from 2012 to 2014. The managing director at the Palm Springs Hilton, Aftab Dada, defended the statue, stating that it brought happiness to the majority of people and brought positive attention to the city through the countless photographs taken by visitors.
However, the statue’s future placement in the city has raised concerns. Specifically, its positioning in front of the Palm Springs Art Museum’s entrance has drawn criticism. Louis Grachos, the director of the museum, expressed his worry about the statue’s impact on visitors, particularly children who may be exposed to the sight of Monroe’s undergarments and underwear as they exit the museum. Despite these concerns, the city council voted to temporarily place the statue at the front of the museum for the next three years.
There are also those who argue that the statue promotes a form of sexual harassment known as upskirting, where individuals take photos under a person’s skirt without their consent. Elizabeth Armstrong, former director of the Palm Springs Art Museum, spoke out against the statue, stating that it forces people to engage in a voyeuristic act. A petition opposing the objectification of Monroe’s statue has gained over 40,000 signatures on Change.org.
The controversy surrounding the statue has raised questions about its artistic value. Aftab Dada, who represents the tourist group PS Resorts that purchased the statue for $1 million, expressed surprise at the negative reception, especially considering Palm Springs’ thriving art scene. Dada argued that the statue is merely an attraction, not a work of art.
To address the backlash, Dada announced plans for an independent research study to evaluate the statue’s economic impact on the city and its benefit to the museum. The study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the statue’s significance and justify its presence in Palm Springs.
As the Marilyn Monroe statue prepares to return to Palm Springs permanently, the debate over its artistic merit and potential sexism continues. The statue’s placement and the impact it may have on museum visitors remain contentious issues, while proponents argue that it brings joy and attention to the city. Only time will tell whether this iconic symbol of Hollywood will find acceptance and support or remain a source of controversy in Palm Springs.
Hits: 15